(1) Projected improvement in the tyre’s lifetime based on the improvements in wear rate with the new MB4/MC4 compounds and the observed performance of the tyres on clients’ mining sites over more than 29 months comparing the tread of the MICHELIN® XDR® (predecessor and prototype) with those of the MICHELIN® XDR® 2 and the MICHELIN® XDR®. Additional improvements concerning the tread cuts and fatigue are expected due to the lower working temperature, down by 17°F, and the anti-corrosion cables. The real results may vary.
(2) Compared with the MICHELIN® XDR® 2 33.00 R51, average performance per mining site. Projected improvement in the tyre’s lifetime based on the performance observed on clients’ mining sites over more than 29 months of MICHELIN® XDR® 2, MICHELIN® XDR® 250 and MICHELIN® XP 57 tyres, in sizes 40.00 R57 and 53/80 R63, which incorporated individual design improvements made to the MICHELIN® XDR® 3.
(3) Compared with the MICHELIN® XDR® 2 50/90 R57, average performance per mining site. Projected improvement in the tyre’s lifetime based on the performance observed on clients’ mining sites over more than 29 months of MICHELIN® XDR® 2, MICHELIN® XDR® 250 and MICHELIN® XP 57 tyres, in sizes 40.00 R57 and 53/80 R63, which incorporated individual design improvements made to the MICHELIN® XDR® 3.
(4) Compared with the MICHELIN® XDR® 2 37.00 R57, average performance per mining site. Projected improvement in the tyre’s lifetime based on the performance observed on clients’ mining sites over more than 29 months of MICHELIN® XDR® 2, MICHELIN® XDR® 250 and MICHELIN® XP 57 tyres, in sizes 40.00 R57 and 53/80 R63, which incorporated individual design improvements made to the MICHELIN® XDR® 3. The real results may vary.
(5) Without compromising the TKPH.
